Multi-band horizontal loop antenna
This 10 - 75 meter tuned horizontal loop antenna (White) is suspended by dacron halyards (blue) between three trees and the roof of the house. It is fed with 450 ohm ladder line (red) down into the ham shack to a Palstar AT1500BAL balanced line antenna tuner. The above graphic depicts the overall layout of this loop antenna cut to one wavelength long on the lowest operating frequency (75 meters). The mean height of the loop above ground is about 50 ft.
- Total length of the loop is 272 ft. (1005 ÷ 3.7 MHz)
The above photo depicts the feed point of the 450 ohm ladder line. The ladder line passes through the roof ridge vent into the garage attic and thence down into the shack. Clear silicon sealant was used throughout. Loop suspension attachment points consist of nylon pulleys attached to dacron halyards to maintain equal tension on all three sides of the loop.
Note: Hams employ various techiques for placing the halyards over the tops of trees. Many even "over engineer" the process by adding spring tension devices, etc. K4QKY prefers to keep it simply by the use of 8lb colored (for best visability) fishing line, a hefty sinker and a slingshot. Once the line has been launched over the tree, pull over light weight nylon cord. Finally, attach the cord to the halyard and pull it over the tree. Alternatively adjust each halyard to achieve the desired tension on the loop.
Why choose a loop antenna?
Loops are usually cut a full wavelength long on the lowest expected operating frequency. The formula for a full wave loop antenna is Length (feet) = 1005/f MHz. For example, a loop for the frequency of 3.800 MHz would be calculated as follows: 1005/3.8 = 264 feet.
A multi-band loop antenna offers significant advantages especially for hams who prefer to only use one wire antenna for all bands:
A loop is quite forgiving and perfect symmetry is not essential. Ideally the loop should be be in a configuration providing the greatest enclosed area at the highest height possible. Since the loop can be erected in unusual places and still perform well, treetop suspension is often used. I rely on heavy duty nylon or black dacron halyards with nylon pulleys at each attachment point to keep equal strain on each leg of the loop. A slingshot, fishing line and heavy sinker get the halyards up and over the trees as necessary.
Unlike a center fed dipole, the loop can be fed at any convenient point.
Since the design of a loop is typically a square or delta form, the need for a long straight run of wire such as a dipole is diminished.
A loop makes for an efficient broadband radiator, even when low to the ground or close to obstructions such as tree limbs. The majority of the amateur bands are harmonically related, typically the 1st harmonic. A loop is easily tuned to resonance on all harmonics of its fundamental frequency. A dipole by contrast is easily tuned to resonance only on its odd harmonics. A loop starts out with 1.2 dB of gain over a dipole on its fundamental frequency.
A loop's gain over a resonant dipole increases with the increasing frequency of operation. Therefore, when used on its harmonics, a loop's signal advantage over a dipole likewise increases. At higher bands, radiation angle is lowered resulting in improved DX performance.
The venerable loop is easy for a balanced line capable tuner to match on all bands when fed with 300 or 450 ohm balanced feed lines.
Although I'm not yet convinced, most hams who use loops often claim that a loop is less susceptible to atmospheric and man-made noise.
Ladder line fed loops significantly reduce the chances of rfi in the shack. The antenna does not rely on the need for a good RF ground to the same extent as unbalanced coax fed dipoles or loops. This is especially important since K4QKY's ham shack is on the second floor. There is widespread misconception on this point. More about this below...
Many hams feel that it is impractical for them to bring ladder line all the way into the shack to the tuner and resort to the use of remotely located coax fed balun (usually 4:1) connected to the ladder line. I have tried this approach and found that it usually works better on some bands than others. My recommendation is to avoid this technique if at all possible.
You too may want to consider the time-honored multi-band loop. It is simple and inexpensive to construct and erect. It promises to yield surprisingly effective performance.
Why feed the loop with balanced line?
If you doubt the viability of feeding wire antennas like loops and dipoles with open wire line, read the following explanation courtesy of K5UA "Charles":
There are two kinds of line loss, the matched line loss and the mismatch line loss. Matched line loss is measured at different frequencies in db per 100 feet when the line is terminated into a load which is identical to the characteristic impedance of the line. The loss increases as the frequency increases. Mismatched line loss is an additional attenuation of the signal because of the line being terminated into a load which is different than the characteristic impedance of the line. This loss increases with frequency, but it also increases with the magnitude of the mismatch. Needless to say, lossy lines like the small coax have higher mismatched line loss numbers for the same amount of mismatch than the lower loss, large coax lines.
Matched line loss is unavoidable, but mismatched line loss is avoidable if the load can be matched to the line at the load end of the line. An example of this would be a gamma match at the yagi terminals to transform the 16 ohm impedance of the antenna to the 50 ohm characteristic impedance of the coax. Another example would be to use a 4:1 balun at the antenna terminals to bring the 16 ohms closer to 50 ohms.
The match can also occur at the transmitter end of the line, but the mismatched line loss would be there. The transmitter would be happy looking into a 50 ohm load, but the mismatched line loss would still be present because the load is not matched.
The beauty of open wire line is that the matched line loss is virtually zero. Even with large line/load mismatches, like 10:1 or 15:1, the additional mismatched line loss is very low. As long as the user has a conjugate match on the transmitter end of line using an antenna matching network, virtually ALL power is radiated by the antenna. Power can not disappear, it is either radiated or lost in the line by attenuation of the dielectric material between the transmission line wires. This is why a random wire of reasonable length may actually radiate MORE power when fed
by open-wire line through a tuner, than a perfectly matched half-wave dipole fed with small coax, assuming the feed line length of each is over 100 feet.
The net effect of this is that you can put up a random length dipole (or a loop as discussed here) and use it on all bands with very little line loss and not have to worry about a bunch or resonant dipoles interfering with each other.
K5UA, in another email, goes on to say:
The probability that any single element antenna is going to have a feed point impedance of 50 +/- j0 ohms is virtually ZERO.
Likewise, when I hear of someone bragging about their quad or yagi that is 50 ohms at resonance, I always ask them how much gain and front to back did they have to sacrifice to get that 50 ohm feed point impedance. Apparently when God was designing the universe and the laws of physics, he did not realize that the tail (50 ohm coax) was going to wag the dog (gain/front-to-back/multi-band operation) in the antenna world.
The concept of resonance also appear to baffle most amateurs because they do not know or understand the three components of impedance (resistance, inductive reactance, and capacitive reactance). A lot of amateurs believe that resonance occurs only when the antenna impedance has the same 50 ohm resistive component as the coax impedance. Actually, resonance is simply defined as the absence of the reactive component of impedance, or in other words, a purely resistive load. If the impedance of a resonant dipole is 80 ohms and you're using 50 ohm coax, the best SWR you can achieve is 1.6 to 1.
SWR really messes with the ham mind, especially with beam antennas where the SWR curve is hardly ever centered on the resonant frequency of the antenna because the feed point impedance at resonance is rarely 50 ohms. The SWR curve is therefore skewed to one side or the other of resonance and non-symmetrical. The worse the mismatch of the coax and the antenna at resonance, the greater the skewing effect and asymmetry of the